| FORUM | ARCHIVE |                    | TOTAL QUIZ RESULT |


  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Should societies drop growth?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Welcome stranger, click here to read about some of the great benefits of registering for a free account with us and joining us in our global online community.


Should societies drop growth?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
fantasus View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 1943
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fantasus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Should societies drop growth?
    Posted: 18 Mar 2013 at 06:31
Should some societies, the ones with highest production pr. capita, depart from the idea of further growth? At the moment they seem to do exactly the opposite, to try by "all means" to get back former rates of increasing production, though not with undisputed succes.
Should other solutions be tried? why not?


Edited by fantasus - 18 Mar 2013 at 06:33
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Captain Vancouver View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 30 Sep 2010
Location: Vancouver Isle
Status: Offline
Points: 2153
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Captain Vancouver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Mar 2013 at 16:47
Short answer: they should not. Growth is a rather ambiguous term, which doesn't always mean what many expect that it does. For example, finding clean energy technologies, and successfully marketing them, could well mean that growth, for that country, expands considerably. It may be that this would be coupled with a decline in fossil fuel industries. Growth is not necessarily bad, or even a measurement of consumption or greed, but merely an abstract number. Growth can be desirable on its own merits, and is pretty much manditory if one's population is growing.
Back to Top
fantasus View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 08 May 2009
Location: Denmark
Status: Offline
Points: 1943
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fantasus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Mar 2013 at 21:10
Originally posted by Captain Vancouver Captain Vancouver wrote:

Short answer: they should not. Growth is a rather ambiguous term, which doesn't always mean what many expect that it does. For example, finding clean energy technologies, and successfully marketing them, could well mean that growth, for that country, expands considerably. It may be that this would be coupled with a decline in fossil fuel industries. Growth is not necessarily bad, or even a measurement of consumption or greed, but merely an abstract number. Growth can be desirable on its own merits, and is pretty much manditory if one's population is growing.
An alternative opinion could be that if not all societies, then the most "wealthy" should drop it as a primary goal. That does not necessarily mean everything comes to a halt. Then are politicians so focused on "growth"? For some of those I know best:yes. While it is not realistic or even desirable  to stop all growth of all types of production or all incomes, it shopuld not be the general or primary goal for politicians or for the rest of societies, except "developing" countries (still the majority of humanity lives in such countries). 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.01
Copyright ©2001-2018 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.