| FORUM | ARCHIVE |                    | TOTAL QUIZ RESULT |


  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - South China Sea.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Welcome stranger, click here to read about some of the great benefits of registering for a free account with us and joining us in our global online community.


South China Sea.

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
toyomotor View Drop Down
Moderator
Moderator
Avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2014
Location: Tasmania, AUST.
Status: Offline
Points: 4081
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote toyomotor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: South China Sea.
    Posted: 13 Jul 2016 at 02:46
From http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-36771749
Quote
An international tribunal has ruled against Chinese claims to rights in the South China Sea, backing a case brought by the Philippines.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration said there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or resources.

China called the ruling "ill-founded" and says it will not be bound by it.

China claims almost all of the South China Sea, including reefs and islands also claimed by others.

The tribunal in The Hague said China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights. It also said China had caused "severe harm to the coral reef environment" by building artificial islands.

The South China Sea could well become the next flash-point if China chooses to ignore the court ruling, and continues to enlarge and to build on the Spratleys and other small islands in the South China Sea. 

The Chinese claim extends almost to Indonesia and effects one of the worlds busiest waterways.


I often wonder why I try.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Captain Vancouver View Drop Down
Council Member
Council Member
Avatar

Joined: 29 Sep 2010
Location: Vancouver Isle
Status: Offline
Points: 2160
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Captain Vancouver Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 Jul 2016 at 01:35
Originally posted by toyomotor toyomotor wrote:

From http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-36771749
Quote
An international tribunal has ruled against Chinese claims to rights in the South China Sea, backing a case brought by the Philippines.

The Permanent Court of Arbitration said there was no evidence that China had historically exercised exclusive control over the waters or resources.

China called the ruling "ill-founded" and says it will not be bound by it.

China claims almost all of the South China Sea, including reefs and islands also claimed by others.

The tribunal in The Hague said China had violated the Philippines' sovereign rights. It also said China had caused "severe harm to the coral reef environment" by building artificial islands.

The South China Sea could well become the next flash-point if China chooses to ignore the court ruling, and continues to enlarge and to build on the Spratleys and other small islands in the South China Sea. 

The Chinese claim extends almost to Indonesia and effects one of the worlds busiest waterways.



China has taken a surprisingly (and disappointingly) belligerent attitude to the S China Sea issue.
This is gunboat diplomacy, 19th century style. It is a sad commentary that international relations are still being done in this way in the 21st century.

And it is hard to say what value they will achieve from the exercise. Yes, this is an important sea route, but control of such routes do not require fixed bases per se, and certainly not when the area is in close proximity to the participants mainland. There may be oil and gas on the sea bed, but that is a question mark at this time, and even if it was so, it hardly seems to necessitate such brinkmanship. Some have suggested that the area is crucial to protecting China's submarine base and also sea based nuclear deterrent on Hainan Island. Again, possible, but such defense would be better off mobile, than a target on a fixed island.

Maybe it is all about image. Western powers basically did the same thing in times gone by, grabbed whatever bit of geography that seemed strategic at the time. So now it may be payback, a PR exercise for a leadership that has little other to offer the masses than rapid economic expansion (at any cost), and chest thumping nationalism.
Back to Top
franciscosan View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan


Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Location: Littleton CO
Status: Offline
Points: 2353
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote franciscosan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 Jul 2016 at 02:39
resources maybe, chest thumping nationalism (maybe), payback, not really.  It is at the cost to the Philippines and Vietnam, (and maybe indirectly to others because of the trade route), not as much to the western powers.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.