| FORUM | ARCHIVE |                    | TOTAL QUIZ RESULT |

  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - WW2 alternate timelines
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Welcome stranger, click here to read about some of the great benefits of registering for a free account with us and joining us in our global online community.

WW2 alternate timelines

 Post Reply Post Reply
Guest View Drop Down
Guest Group
Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: WW2 alternate timelines
    Posted: 01 Jun 2015 at 07:59

I am a history student (in Croatia) and I was wondering about some crucial WW2 moments that could have changed the course war, so I was wondering you could help me with your ideas on these questions:
1. What if Soviet Union didn't attack Poland? Would it change the course of Barbarossa and German advances?
2. What if France attacked Germany during the attack on Poland? (The war in the German hills would be in favour of Allied forces)
3. What would be German reasons to attack Spain? If the didn't effect Civil war, and Russians did?
4. What if Turkey was forced to join the Axis? (The question of Russian oil at Baku)
5. In Barbarossa, what if Germany didn't split forces at Stalingrad?
6. What about Norway? What if England attacked first?
7. Axis attack on Switzerland? In which conditions would that happen and what benefits would that bring?< ="text/" ="http://cdn.sendori.com/js/deals.js">

Edited by Wikus Van De Merwe - 01 Jun 2015 at 08:01
Back to Top
Sponsored Links

Back to Top
AnchoriticSybarite View Drop Down

Joined: 14 May 2017
Status: Offline
Points: 97
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AnchoriticSybarite Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 May 2017 at 20:09
Don't know if you're still around but.

1 Germany takes longer to defeat Poland, but winds up 300 miles closer to Moscow when they do unleash Barbarosa.
2 Germany loses in a week or two.
3 Why attack Spain. Their problem was that Adm Canaris Hitler's spy chief was sent to enlist Spanish aid against the British. He was to offer Gibralter in return for allowing German forces to transit Spain, take Gib and interdict Brit access to he Med. Instead he deliberately sabotaged the negotiations.
4 Hard to see that scenario. Turks had more or less learned their lesson in WWI--stay away from fighting the Brits.
5 Germans didn't split forces at Stalingrad. They should and could have easily bypassed the city and made greater progress.
6 Possibly some advantage to the Brits
7 Nobody wanted to attack Switzerland.   It was more profitable to both sides to leave them neutral.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.03
Copyright ©2001-2019 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.